July 20, 2008
CLARIFICATION
Il y a une question qui revient toujours dans tous les entretiens que j’ai faits. Le rapport entre ma vie et ma fiction. C’est une question que je ne peux pas éviter. Mais je voudrais clarifier une chose une fois pour toute. Oui, une grande partie des histoires que je raconte dans mes livres sont basées sur des événements que j’ai vécus. Mais j’insiste. Ce que j’écris n’est pas de la fiction autobiographique, et certainement pas ce qu’on aime appeler ces jours-ci de l’autofiction. En fait, il se peut même que mes livres ne soient pas des romans – romans dans le sens que les éditeurs donnent à ce genre de livres. Le sous-titre de Quitte ou double [le premier volume du grand livre que j’écris depuis plus de quarante ans] dit bien ce que j’écris : Un vrai discours fictif.
Pour moi, dès que les événements [de ma vie ou de l’Histoire] passent dans le langage ils deviennent fictifs. Mallarmé l’a très s bien dit : Tout ce qui s’écrit est fictif. Donc ma réponse est simple : j’écris de la fiction, même si cette fiction semble raconter ma vie – réelle ou imaginée.
Le plus souvent les gens qui insistent que ce que j’écris est autobiographique ne savent rien de ma vie. Voila ce que j’ai dit à un éditeur qui avait refusé le manuscrit de La fourrure de ma tante Rachel, parce qu’il le trouvait trop autobiographique : Mais monsieur que savez-vous de ma vie pour dire cela? Et il me répondit : Rien.
CLARIFICATION
There is a question that is always asked when I give an interview. The relationship between my life and my fiction. This is a question I cannot avoid. But I would clarify this once and for all. Yes, a good part of the stories I tell in my books are based on events that I have lived. But I insist. What I write is not autobiographical fiction, and certainly not what the French like to call, autofiction. In fact, it is quite possible that the books I write are not novels - novels in the sense that publishers give to this type of books. The subtitle of Double or Nothing [the first volume of the big book I’ve been writing for more than forty years] states clearly what I write: a real fictitious discourse.
For me, as soon as the events [of my life or of history] are related with words they become fictitious. Mallarmé said it very clearly: all that is written is fictitious. Therefore, my answer is simple: I write fiction, even if this fiction seems to tell the story of my life – real or imagined.
Often the people who insist on saying that what I write is autobiographical know nothing about my life. This is what I once asked a publisher who rejected the manuscript of My Aunt Rachel’s Fur because he found it too autobiographical: but sire, what do you know about my life to say this? And he replied: nothing.
Pour moi, dès que les événements [de ma vie ou de l’Histoire] passent dans le langage ils deviennent fictifs. Mallarmé l’a très s bien dit : Tout ce qui s’écrit est fictif. Donc ma réponse est simple : j’écris de la fiction, même si cette fiction semble raconter ma vie – réelle ou imaginée.
Le plus souvent les gens qui insistent que ce que j’écris est autobiographique ne savent rien de ma vie. Voila ce que j’ai dit à un éditeur qui avait refusé le manuscrit de La fourrure de ma tante Rachel, parce qu’il le trouvait trop autobiographique : Mais monsieur que savez-vous de ma vie pour dire cela? Et il me répondit : Rien.
CLARIFICATION
There is a question that is always asked when I give an interview. The relationship between my life and my fiction. This is a question I cannot avoid. But I would clarify this once and for all. Yes, a good part of the stories I tell in my books are based on events that I have lived. But I insist. What I write is not autobiographical fiction, and certainly not what the French like to call, autofiction. In fact, it is quite possible that the books I write are not novels - novels in the sense that publishers give to this type of books. The subtitle of Double or Nothing [the first volume of the big book I’ve been writing for more than forty years] states clearly what I write: a real fictitious discourse.
For me, as soon as the events [of my life or of history] are related with words they become fictitious. Mallarmé said it very clearly: all that is written is fictitious. Therefore, my answer is simple: I write fiction, even if this fiction seems to tell the story of my life – real or imagined.
Often the people who insist on saying that what I write is autobiographical know nothing about my life. This is what I once asked a publisher who rejected the manuscript of My Aunt Rachel’s Fur because he found it too autobiographical: but sire, what do you know about my life to say this? And he replied: nothing.
Comments:
<< Home
here is a little clarification I wrote today
in two languages
I think it should be on the blog
in case people still want to know
if I write autobiographical fiction
in two languages
I think it should be on the blog
in case people still want to know
if I write autobiographical fiction
insofar as all utterances, texts & speech acts are fictions, the stage is set for us to denial of truth-claims entirely and languor in the paradox of our own mental muck.
It sure is funny in here.
It sure is funny in here.
Bonjour,
je suis étudiante en Master 1 de Littérature contemporaine et j'intègre "Retour au fumier" (et si j'avais pu, "La Fourrure de ma tante Rachel" mais je ne l'ai trouvé absolument nulle part) à ma problématique (le monologue dialogué ou l'incommunicabilité et les simulacres d'oralité dans les romans à dominante orale de l'époque contemporaine) et il se trouve que cette remarque m'aide beaucoup^^ Merci, enfin c'était juste pour ça ;)
je suis étudiante en Master 1 de Littérature contemporaine et j'intègre "Retour au fumier" (et si j'avais pu, "La Fourrure de ma tante Rachel" mais je ne l'ai trouvé absolument nulle part) à ma problématique (le monologue dialogué ou l'incommunicabilité et les simulacres d'oralité dans les romans à dominante orale de l'époque contemporaine) et il se trouve que cette remarque m'aide beaucoup^^ Merci, enfin c'était juste pour ça ;)
Eliz Keto v of each week to get a clearer picture of just how much calories you really are consuming. If your diet looks healthy and yet you still aren't losing any weight, you could need to look at your
LNG Active Male Enhancement However, contrary to negative hype, there are innumerable advantages that a male enhancement product can provide, which includes -
lng active male enhancement reviews because it has the bromelain enzyme. Studies continue to be conducted on this enzyme
Keto Jolt Lastly, the audience that supports the person's weight loss provides the client a sense of connection from whichtake on a sense of purpose. For this reason, it is not at all uncommon that those in recovery from drugs or alcohol become drug counselors, or those who achieve significant weight loss become personal trainers.
Wonder Full Keto you weight gain put you off, and instead look at your program and see if anything needs to change, such as increasing your activity levels. And when you reach your goals celebrate by treating
Slim x genie keto tendency that you have taken a lot of food within 20 minutes compared to eating slowly
Keto 10x 5 month period, I can tell you that these myths only get in the way of healthy and safe rapid weight loss. And NO! These patients did NOT have gastric bypasses or lap bands! They used their bodies' natural weight loss tactics to succeed.
Control X Keto patients first myth are justifying people staying on their diets or regimens longer. It there are multiple articles explaining against losing more than 1-2 pounds per week, however you see that
Mega Keto Diet at a steady weight. However, when it comes to losing weight, eating breakfast is not an and dinner afterward. A person who skips breakfast puts their body in starvation mode so that any excess food that you eat later in the day instantly becomes fat as the body scrambles to keep
Post a Comment
<< Home